REVISION:
1. FOCUS ON THE OPENING: Read
the first sentence aloud:
Does the paper start with something overly general like
this:
“Humankind has often searched for ways to…” --or this--
“Slavery was
a great tragedy in American history.”
--or this--
“Webster’s Dictionary defines freedom as…” --or
this--
“Since the
beginning of time…”
Is the opening
sentence exciting? Is it overly general?
Give the author a sense of how the first sentence sounds
to a reader:
2. FOCUS ON THE ARGUMENT: Read
the introduction aloud.
In your own words, what is the subject of this paper?
What is the key argument/thesis of this paper? Write it
here.
The thesis is like a one-sentence version of your paper.
Take a firm stand against this argument.
“I disagree with
this statement because…”
Were you able to disagree? Does the author
need to work on making a
bold claim?
EDITING: (do not write run-on, comma splice, fragment, or specific grammar help)
3. FOCUS ON THE FORM:
Read the
introduction starting with the last sentence and ending with the first.
If a sentence feels awkward, seems
shaky, or sounds unclear, draw a squiggly line underneath it, like this:
These
are a few example of individual who did not let fear overcome them.
Notice that we
are not fixing mistakes here—just pointing at them!
4. TURN THE PAPER OVER AND MAKE
SOME ENCOURAGING REMARK TO THE AUTHOR.
WHERE TO GO FROM HERE:
Once you have laid out your thesis, don’t forget about it. In writing the rest of the paper, you are really just developing your thesis. Develop your thesis logically from paragraph to paragraph.
Your reader should always know where your argument has come from, where it is now, and where it is going. If you are unable to break your thesis into parts that you can prove in various ways, then you probably have a problematic thesis.
Analyze: Students are often puzzled when their professors mark them down for summarizing or merely narrating rather than analyzing. What does it mean to analyze? In the narrow sense, to analyze means to break down into parts and to study the interrelationships of those parts. If you analyze water, you break it down into hydrogen and oxygen. In a broader sense, historical analysis explains the origins and significance of events.
Historical analysis digs beneath the surface to see relationships or distinctions that are not immediately obvious.
Historical analysis is critical; it evaluates sources, assigns significance to causes, and weighs competing explanations.